Planning for a zero emissions future.

Developed by NYSERDA, RMI, Building Energy Exchange, and Urban Land Institute, the Retrofit Playbook for Large Buildings offers a living library of case studies, technical resources, and best practices to support high quality, low carbon retrofits. By utilizing the solutions and strategic planning tools presented here, building owners and their teams can develop decarbonization roadmaps that create asset value, reduce emissions, and enhance the resilience of their assets. Start planning now and explore our educational resources to inform your decarbonization journey.

Start planning now and explore our educational resources to inform your decarbonization journey.
view planning guides

Learn from real-world case studies.

more case studies

Follow the 3-step strategic planning approach to generate an action plan for your building.

Getting Started

Ugita coritat inciti ipid quod magnati strupta tiorest ibusda que od quibus, sit quidita tatiatesed que la denihic to is eos es alit qui acearuptae explab ilibusciur mo dem ne sum as ratus, occum cullament. Orio. Bearchi litemporem eat dolupti dio. Bit officte mporerum

get project initiation guidance

Step 1: Examine Current Conditions

Modernizing building energy systems is unavoidable over time. Systems require maintenance and well-planned investments as asset renewal strategies change and energy economics evolve. Starting with a comprehensive examination of the asset conditions empowers building owners and engineers to incorporate investment events into plans for building systems upgrades and emissions reductions.

get assessment planning guidance

Building System Conditions


Potential Events

  • Equipment nearing end of life
  • New heat source potential
  • Shifting tenant loads
  • Poor indoor air quality
  • Façade maintenance
  • Resilience upgrades

Asset Conditions


Potential Events

  • Repositioning
  • Recapitalization
  • Capital event cycles
  • Tenant turnover/vacancy
  • Carbon emission limits
  • Tenant and investor sustainability demands
  • Building codes

Market Conditions


Potential Events

  • Technology improves
  • Market supply and demand changes
  • Policy advances
  • Utility prices fluctuate
  • Infrastructure transitions
  • Fuels phase out
  • Assets are stranded

Step 2: Design Resource Efficient Solutions

Resource efficient engineering looks at emissions reduction holistically. It prioritizes the creation of a long-term action plan that illustrates how to phase in solutions over extended timelines to yield achievable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsive retrofits. This approach is being implemented in real-life projects, and occurs in five phases:

get XXX guidance

Building Energy Use Over Time

Building Energy Use

Energy from Fossil Fuels

Energy from Electricity

  • Understand system function
  • Disaggregate load profiles
  • Identify heat waste & recovery opportunities
  • Envelope improvement
  • Control optimization 
  • Ventilation improvements 
  • Dedicated outside air system
  • Hydronic distribution 
  • Lower heating supply temp
  • Terminal units replacement 
  • Waterside heat recovery
  • Airside heat recovery
  • Wastewater heat recovery
  • Thermal energy networks
  • Air source heat pumps 
  • Water source heat pumps 
  • Geothermal 
  • Thermal layering
  • Heat pumps
  • Thermal storage 
  • District thermal network 
  • Grid-interactivity

Step 3: Build the Business Case

The objective of this step is to determine the optimal retrofit solution and phasing for building decarbonization. The evaluation should focus on the cost effectiveness of distinct, alternate scenarios for reducing emissions, based on the identified technical approaches, implementation timelines, and alignment with capital plan and asset management criteria. This net present value analysis should account for the costs and risks of a business-as-usual approach alongside the costs and value of building decarbonization. The result delivers a decarbonization action plan that meets the financial needs of the building, with investments tied to long-term objectives related to the business triggers identified above in Step 1.

get XXX guidance

Quantifying the Costs and Benefits of a Decarbonization Plan


Dollar symbol

Retrofit Costs

What investments can be made in integrated engineering solutions, over time?

  • Reduce loads
  • Reconfigure systems 
  • Recover heat 
  • Partial electrification 
  • Full electrification

By phasing solutions, reactive investments are avoided. 

Minus symbol

Avoided Costs

What costs can be avoided or replaced using strategic planning?

  • Routine maintenance
  • Equipment replacement
  • Fit-outs
  • Refreshes
  • Repositioning 
  • Cooling and ventilation improvements 

Decarbonization planning incorporates regular maintenance with upgrades, to retrofit efficiently.

Minus symbol

Avoided Risks

What risks are associated with a business-as-usual approach?

  • Tenant retention
  • Energy prices
  • Fines
  • Regulations
  • Valuation
  • Reputation
  • Obsolescence
  • Stranded assets 

Quantifying all risks enables holistic decision-making.

Plus symbol

Added Value

What value is added
beyond bill savings?

  • Incentives
  • Valuation
  • Exit yield
  • Sustainability
  • Green leases
  • Insurance access
  • Debt capital access
  • Resilience
  • Thermal comfort
  • Cooling
  • Ventilation
  • Occupant health
  • Reputation 

Building modernization unlocks far-reaching benefits.

Equals symbol

Completing these three steps results in a Strategic Decarbonization Action Plan that is responsive to a building’s technical and financial circumstances.

Conceptual Emissions Reductions with Strategic Decarbonization

Start building value today while working toward a decarbonized future. 

Partners in Strategic Decarbonization

View case study

Winn Companies

View case study

Vornado

View case study

URBS

View case study

Turner Construction

View case study

Trinity Church Wall Street

View case study

Tishman Speyer

View case study

The Durst Organization

View case study

The Capitol

View case study

Taitem Engineering

View case study

Syracuse Housing Authority

View case study

SWBR

View case study

Sunamp

View case study

Steven Winter Associates, Inc.

View case study

Smith Engineering

View case study

Skansa

View case study

Sisters of Charity Housing Development

View case study

Silverstein Properties

View case study

SHARC Energy

View case study

Ryan Soames Engineering

View case study

Rudin Management Company

View case study

RMI

View case study

RiseBoro

View case study

Reos Partners

View case study

Quest Energy Group

View case study

Purpose by Design Architects

View case study

Paul A. Castrucci Architects, PLLC

View case study

Paths Development LLC

View case study

Open Market Esco LLC

View case study

Omni New York LLC

View case study

Norges Bank

View case study

Magrann

View case study

M/E Engineering

View case study

Luthin Associates

View case study

Loring Consulting Engineers

View case study

Lefrak

View case study

LaBella Associates

View case study

L+M

View case study

KOW Building Consultants

View case study

Kelvin

View case study

Jonathan Rose Companies

View case study

Johnson Controls

View case study

Joe NYC

View case study

Jaros, Baum & Bolles

View case study

Invesco Ltd

View case study

Inglese Architecture + Engineering

View case study

IAE Inglese

View case study

Hydronic Shell T

View case study

Hudson Square Properties

View case study

Hines

View case study

Hanac

View case study

Hamilton Stern

View case study

FirstService Residential

View case study

Fairstead

View case study

Ettinger Engineering Associates

View case study

Equity Residential

View case study

Energy Machines

View case study

EN-Power

View case study

Empire State Realty Trust

View case study

Egg Geo

View case study

Ecosystem

View case study

Dextall

View case study

Cycle Retrotech

View case study

Curtis + Ginsburg Architects

View case study

Cosentini Associates

View case study

Consigli Construction

View case study

Chartered Properties

View case study

Buro Happold

View case study

Brookfield Properties

View case study

Bright Power

View case study

Boston Properties

View case study

Blueprint Power

View case study

Beam Living

View case study

Ascendant Neighborhood Development

View case study

Amalgamated Housing Corporation